Guest Blog Post from HOPE Leadership Institute Participant- Class of 2009:
One issue affecting my community in the current budget crisis is the closing of a TRIO student support services unit at UC Irvine, my alma mater. The Student Academic Advancement Services Office is funded in part by a federal grant that is awarded to meet specific proposal requirements to serve first generation and low income undergraduates. What makes this program closure problematic is that the Student Academic Advancement Services receives federal funds, and changing a program abruptly without a plan in place could jeopardize those much needed dollars. Federal TRIO programs were established in the 1960s as part of President Johnson’s War on Poverty agenda. Federal grant programs, such as Student Academic Advancement Services (SAAS), have to adhere to strict proposal requirements, and ironically this program has secured federal funds to run through the next academic year, so why is it being closed?
On July 30, 2009, the Dean of Undergraduate Education, Sharon Salinger, informed the Student Academic Advancement Office that it would be shut down on August 31 due to University budget cuts. This office has staff with approximately 100 combined years of experience providing services to this at-risk population of college students and has been referred to as a model program by independent auditors. First generation and low income undergraduates are often at risk of not completing college because they lack the familial support systems and networks to help them succeed. Undergraduates who come from families with parents who haven’t even been to college often don’t know where to begin to seek resources to support their educational experiences. This is where offices like SAAS come in.
SAAS provides key college acculturation programs such as Summer Bridge, peer counseling workshops, access to information about test preparation, research opportunities, and support to apply for graduate school. In addition to these services, the office staff is diverse. First generation and low income students can be any ethnicity, but often, in the Golden State, they are students of color. Having role models and counselors who come from similar circumstances is often a positive reminder of what these students can achieve.
Dean Sharon Salinger has repeatedly cited the state budget crisis as the reason for closing the SAAS offices, but funds from the federal government have already been secured for the upcoming school year under a proposal written by the existing staff. Why would the Dean jeopardize these funds by closing an office that has performed successfully for over 30 years on the UC Irvine campus with such vast experience? Isn’t this maneuver akin to GOP governors trying to refuse federal stimulus funds? I think so because Dean Salinger, a Professor of Humanities with expertise on colonial taverns and social drinking, does not prior have professional experience working with TRIO programs, as described on her official faculty profile. More importantly, Salinger has not offered an alternative plan to the existing successful program.
In speaking with Angelita Salas, a counselor for the soon to be closed SAAS program, about what Dean Salinger has planned for the most vulnerable of UC Irvine’s undergraduates, she offered, “The Dean keeps making reference that she is planning to have similar SAAS programs — albeit under a different administrative structure. She has shown nothing to any of us in writing or verbally to prove it or has anything in place — no staff, nothing. The students keep asking, ‘What are these plans?’ And with school starting in a month, many want to know what will be here for them when they arrive.”
First generation and low income undergraduates at UC Irvine deserve more. They have crossed many hurdles to get to the state’s premiere public higher education system. Many have been seeing SAAS counselors and mentors for a while and have built rapports with the professional and student staff. At a time of uncertainty in their private lives because of financial constraints and the general climate of insecurity, is closing down a federally funded support services program and restructuring with a month before the start of fall quarter a wise decision? Furthermore, can this kind of restructuring occur most expediently with a Dean who students feel acted unethically in shutting down the SAAS office?
Leandra Ordorica, a third year Chicano/Latino studies major at UCI, expressed her frustrations with Dean Salinger’s decision to terminate the SAAS program. She stated, “What Dean Salinger did was unethical, and it was a blind decision. Dean Salinger has not worked with students enough for her to know that TRIO programs such as SAAS do work. SAAS has been successful for the last 30years; I do not understand why Salinger decided to close down a successful and well know program such as SAAS. Dean Salinger’s position is to overlook the Department of Undergraduate Education. However, she does not work directly with our students for her to know the positive impact that SAAS provide for low income, first generation, and disabled students at UCI.”
The students and alumni of the SAAS program have created a facebook group to address their plight. In addition, the students have produced this youtube video to express their appreciation and desire for the program to continue. While the closing date of the office is next week, it isn’t too late to express to the UC administration and the US Department of Education Federal TRIO Office Director the dissatisfaction of abruptly changing course one month out before the start of the academic school year. You can reach the Office of Federal TRIO Programs Director Linda Byrd-Johnson at (202) 502-7600 or e-mail at linda.byrd-johnson@ed.gov. And you can e-mail the administration at UC Irvine at chancellor@uci.edu and president@ucop.edu (UC Office of the President).
Finally, I know many successful alumni who have utilized the support services offered by Student Academic Advancement Services at UC Irvine. Many of those SAAS Anteater alumni are still in contact with the current program staff and have come back to campus to share their experiences. It saddens me, as an anteater alum, to know that current students will pay more for tuition and receive less, not having the benefits of a program with a proven track record.